Inoculation effect of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 on N2O emissions during rhizoremediation of diesel
HomeHome > News > Inoculation effect of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 on N2O emissions during rhizoremediation of diesel

Inoculation effect of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 on N2O emissions during rhizoremediation of diesel

Jul 25, 2023

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 13018 (2022) Cite this article

583 Accesses

2 Citations

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

The demand for rhizoremediation technology that can minimize greenhouse gas emissions while effectively removing pollutants in order to mitigate climate change has increased. The inoculation effect of N2O-reducing Pseudomonas sp. TF716 on N2O emissions and on remediation performance during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil planted with tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) or maize (Zea mays) was investigated. Pseudomonas sp. TF716 was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of tall fescue. The maximum N2O reduction rate of TF716 was 18.9 mmol N2O g dry cells−1 h−1, which is superior to the rates for previously reported Pseudomonas spp. When Pseudomonas sp. TF716 was added to diesel-contaminated soil planted with tall fescue, the soil N2O-reduction potential was 2.88 times higher than that of soil with no inoculation during the initial period (0–19 d), and 1.08–1.13 times higher thereafter. However, there was no enhancement in the N2O-reduction potential for the soil planted with maize following inoculation with strain TF716. In addition, TF716 inoculation did not significantly affect diesel degradation during rhizoremediation, suggesting that the activity of those microorganisms involved in diesel degradation was unaffected by TF716 treatment. Analysis of the dynamics of the bacterial genera associated with N2O reduction showed that Pseudomonas had the highest relative abundance during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil planted with tall fescue and treated with strain TF716. Overall, these results suggest that N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil using tall fescue can be reduced with the addition of Pseudomonas sp. TF716.

Petroleum oil is the most widely used energy source globally, and petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) can leak into the soil and groundwater during its storage, transportation, and use, threatening the environment1,2,3. PHs that contaminate the soil not only disturb the ecological balance but also damage the surrounding landscape and emit odors, causing aesthetic and economic damage4,5. Of the various soil remediation technologies that have been proposed, rhizoremediation is particularly promising because it can accelerate the biodegradation of PHs by taking advantage of the close interaction between plant roots and rhizospheric microorganisms1.

In the rhizoremediation of PH-contaminated soil, nitrogen sources are typically added to improve the biodegradation efficiency, which may result in nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions6. Ammonium in the soil is typically nitrified and then denitrified by microorganisms and emitted into the atmosphere in the form of N2. However, if the reduction of N2O, an intermediate metabolite, to N2 does not occur, N2O may be released6,7,8. N2O is a significant greenhouse gas with a global warming potential (GWP) that is about 298 times higher than that of CO29. Once discharged into the atmosphere, N2O has a long residence time of about 121 years9 and is a precursor of nitric oxide (NO), which destroys the ozone layer in the stratosphere via photochemical reactions10,11.

As part of the goal to remove environmental pollutants as a response to climate change, it is necessary to minimize N2O emissions during the remediation of PH-contaminated soil. A useful solution in this regard is to actively use bacteria that can reduce N2O to N2. Therefore, in the present study, the effect of a N2O-reducing bacterium on N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation of PH-contaminated soil was evaluated. A bacterial isolate with excellent N2O-reduction ability was extracted from an enriched broth that employed rhizosphere soil as the inoculum source, and N2O was supplied as a final electron acceptor. The inoculation effect of the isolated bacterium on the N2O-reduction potential of soil samples was evaluated for the rhizoremediation of PH-contaminated soil planted with tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) or maize (Zea mays). In addition, the inoculation effect of the isolate on the PH-removal efficiency, plant growth, and soil bacterial community associated with N2O reduction was also investigated.

A soil sample (2 g) obtained from the rhizosphere of tall fescue (F. arundinacea) was suspended in 200 mL of a mineral medium containing KH2PO4 (169.7 mg L−1), MgSO4·7H2O (751.1 mg L−1), CaCl·2H2O (451.6 mg L−1), EDTA (5.0 mg L−1), FeSO4·7H2O (5.0 mg L−1), and 1 mg L−1 of a trace element solution. The trace element solution contained ZnSO4·7H2O (0.43 mg L−1), CoCl2·6H2O (0.24 mg L−1), MnCl2·4H2O (0.99 mg L−1), CuSO4·5H2O (0.25 mg L−1), Na2MoO4·2H2O (0.22 mg L−1), NiCl2·6H2O (0.19 mg L−1), and Na2SeO4 (0.21 mg L−1). The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7 with 1 M NaOH and 1 M HCl solutions. The soil suspension was added to a 1.2-L serum bottle and then sealed with a butyl rubber stopper after purging with N2 gas to maintain anaerobic conditions. Sterile stock solutions of glucose and sodium acetate as a carbon source were added to the bottle with a syringe to a final concentration of 100 mg L−1 each based on the chemical oxygen demand (COD). N2O gas (99%; Dong-A Specialty Gases Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea) was injected into the bottle via a syringe to adjust the final headspace concentration to 1000 ppm (v/v). The serum bottle was incubated at 30 °C under agitation at 120 rpm. The N2O concentration was monitored periodically using a gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a micro-electron capture detector8. When the N2O concentration in the headspace of the bottle decreased below 10 ppm, additional N2O gas was injected into the bottle to a headspace concentration of 1000 ppm (v/v). The injection of N2O gas was repeated in this way a further six times. Following this, 40 ml of the culture was transferred to a serum bottle containing 160 ml of the fresh mineral medium. The transferred culture was incubated under the same conditions as described above. The N2O-reducing consortium of bacteria was obtained after the transfer process had been repeated five times in the same manner as described above.

The N2O-reducing consortium was diluted serially with sterile distilled water and spread onto Difco™ LB agar plates. The LB agar medium (pH 7.0) contained tryptone (10 g L−1), yeast extract (5 g L−1), NaCl (10 g L−1), and agar (15 g L−1). The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. Each colony was then transferred to a fresh LB agar plate and incubated under the same conditions. This process was repeated until eight pure colonies had been obtained.

The N2O-reduction activity of the eight isolates was then compared. The isolates were incubated in 10 mL of LB broth at 30 °C for 24 h at 120 rpm under aerobic conditions. Each culture broth was centrifuged, and the obtained cell pellet was rinsed with distilled water and used to prepare a cell suspension with an optical density (OD600nm) of 1.0 in a mineral medium containing NaCl (8 g L−1), KCl (0.2 g L−1), Na2HPO4 (1.44 g L−1), and KH2PO4 (0.24 g L−1) (pH 7.0). The optical density was measured spectrophotometrically at 600 nm using a Libra S22 spectrophotometer (Biochrom, Cambridge, UK). A 1 mL aliquot of each cell suspension was added to a 120-mL serum bottle containing 9 mL of the fresh mineral medium. The bottle was sealed with a butyl rubber stopper after purging with N2 gas, and the carbon source was added to the bottle with a syringe to a final concentration of 100 mg L−1 based on the COD. N2O gas was injected into each bottle to a concentration of 1000 ppm, and the N2O concentration in the sample headspace was monitored over time using a gas chromatograph. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The isolate with the highest activity was labeled isolate TF716.

To identity isolate TF716, a TF716 colony was mixed with 15 μL of sterilized water and treated for 3 min in a heating block at 95 °C. After the cellular debris was removed via centrifugation (7500 × g), the DNA sample in the obtained supernatant was used as a template for PCR. To target the 16S rRNA gene, 340F and 805R primers were used for amplification8. The PCR products were sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, Republic of Korea) and the resulting sequence was analyzed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) developed by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). A molecular phylogenetic tree was constructed with the 16S rRNA sequences of isolate TF716 and known N2O- and oil-degrading bacteria using MEGA software (version 11, www.megasoftware.net) and a neighbor-joining algorithm.

The effects of the N2O concentration and root exudate on N2O reduction by strain TF716 were characterized. An aliquot of a cell suspension (1 mL) with an OD600 of 1.0 prepared in the manner described above was added to a 120-ml serum bottle containing 9 mL of a mineral medium. The carbon solution was injected into the bottle after purging and sealing in the same manner as described above. To determine the effect of the N2O concentration on the N2O-reduction activity of strain TF716, N2O gas was injected into the bottle to a concentration of 200, 500, 750, 1000, or 1500 ppm.

The root exudate of tall fescue (F. arundinacea) and maize (Z. mays) was prepared in a similar manner to that described in a previous paper12. Tall fescue and maize, grown in non-contaminated soil, was carefully sampled, and the soil adhering loosely to the root removed by shaking the plant. After washing with distilled water (DW) several times, 10 g of each root sample was added into 100 ml of sterilized DW, and mixed for 2 h at 50 °C. After cooling each mixed solution at room temperature, the mixed solution was filtered with 0.45 µm filter. Each filtered solution was used as root exudate. The COD of the root exudate for tall fescue and maize was 750 and 780 mg L−1, respectively. The compounds in the mineral medium were also added to the root exudate at the same concentrations as in the mineral medium to produce the root exudate medium. The cell suspension was added to a 120-ml serum bottle containing 9 mL of the root exudate medium. For the control, the carbon source was added to all conditions. N2O gas was injected into each bottle to a final concentration of 1000 ppm. All experiments were performed at 30 °C with 120 rpm in triplicate. The N2O reduction rate for each experimental condition was calculated as described in a previous paper8. The maximum N2O reduction rate (Vmax) and saturation constant (Km) were determined using Lineweaver–Burk plots (Park et al., 2020). Cell concentrations were determined from the relationship between the optical density measured at 600 nm and the dry cell weight (DCW, g). To determine the dry cell weight, the cells in the cell suspension were harvested via centrifugation (7500 × g) and dried at 70 °C for 24 h.

A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the inoculation effect of the isolate TF716 on the rhizoremediation performance of diesel-contaminated soil planted with tall fescue or maize. Soil was collected from a garden on the rooftop of the New Engineering Building at Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (37°57′ N, 126°95′ E). The soil texture was loamy sand. After sieving the soil with a 2-mm sieve to remove weeds and stones, the soil was artificially contaminated with diesel at initial concentrations of 10,000 mg-diesel kg-soil−1. The contaminated soil was then stored in a shaded location on the rooftop for seven days and mixed uniformly once a day. To provide N and P, compost was added to the contaminated soil at a 1:19 (w/w) ratio. The compost was purchased from a commercial vendor (Seokgang Green Fertilizer Inc., Icheon, Republic of Korea) and consisted of fermented swine manure (40%), sawdust (49%), cow manure (10%), and the bacterial inoculum (1%). The NH4+–N, NO3–N, and total P concentrations of the contaminated soil amended with compost were 12.2, 15.7, and 1195.2 mg kg-soil−1, respectively. The organic matter content and pH were 27.1% and 6.8, respectively. The cell suspension of isolate TF716, which was prepared by cultivating the cells in the LB medium as described above, followed by harvesting and rinsing, was added to the soil samples at a cell concentration of 2 × 106 CFU∙kg-soil−1.

A drainer and coarse sand were first placed on the bottom of each pot (diameter of 180 mm; height of 150 mm), and 3 kg of the contaminated soil with or without isolate TF716 was then added to each pot. Ten tall fescue or five maize seedlings were planted in each pot. The pot experiment was conducted in triplicate. The tall fescue seedlings were cultivated from seed for 45 days in a garden on the rooftop of the New Engineering Building at Ewha Womans University. Maize seedlings were purchased (Mojong 114, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), and cultivated for 45 days in the garden. The pot experiment was conducted on the rooftop of the New Engineering Building, Ewha Womans University for 59 days (May 28 to July 26, 2021). The pot soil was watered twice a week to maintain an average water content of about 28% during the experimental period. During the pot experiment, the pH of the soil ranged from 6.5 to 7.2, and there was no significant difference in the soil pH between the experimental conditions (data not shown).

To evaluate the inoculation effect of isolate TF716 on the N2O-reduction potential of the soil during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil, rhizosphere soil samples were taken randomly from each pot on days 0, 19, 40, and 59. After air-drying at room temperature, 10 g of each soil sample was added to a 600-mL serum bottle containing 30 ml of the mineral medium. The N2O reduction potential was evaluated in the same manner as described previously13.

To analyze the residual diesel concentrations in the soil sampled on days 19 and 59, the collected soil was freeze-dried, and 3 g of each sample was consequently added to individual test tubes, after which 10 mL of hexane–acetone (1:1, v/v) solution was added as the solvent for extraction. The diesel concentration was measured using the same method and gas chromatograph (GC 6980 N system, Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) as described in a previous study13. On day 59, the roots of the tall fescue and maize were sampled after shaking the rhizosphere soil away from the roots. The roots were then dried in an oven at 70 °C for 72 h, and then the dry weight of the roots was measured.

To characterize the dynamics of the bacterial community associated with N2O reduction during rhizoremediation, the bacterial metagenome in the soil was analyzed using nosZ primer sets targeting the N2O reductase gene. Genomic DNA from the air-dried soil samples was extracted using a NucleoSpin® Soil Kit (Macherey–Nagel GmbH, Düren, Germany) and a BeadBeater-8 system (BioSpec Products Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The genomic DNA samples were eluted in 50 µL of elution buffer and quantified using a SpectraMax QuickDrop spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The extracted genomic DNA samples were then stored at − 23 °C before use. PCR was performed based on a primer set of amplicon-nosZIF (5’-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGWCSYTGTTCMTCGACAGCCAG-3’) and amplicon-nosZIR (5’-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGATGTCGATCARCTGVKCRTTYTC-3’)14. The underlined sequences are pre-adapters, the sequences in bold are sequencing primer sequences, and the sequences in italics are the specific locus primers. The PCR steps were conducted as described in previous reports13,14. The sequences were analyzed via an Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform (Illumina Inc.) by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea). The sequence reads were analyzed using QIIME 1.9 by Macrogen Inc.15. Sequences outside of the target base pairs were removed using Fast Length Adjustment of Short Reads (FLASH) 1.2.1116. Ambiguous and chimeric sequences were then removed and sequences were classified into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 97% similarity using the CD-HIT-OTU program17. The taxonomy for each OTU was assigned based on the NCBI 16S microbial database.

Microsoft Excel 2013 (Microsoft Co., Redmond, WA, USA) was employed to conduct t-tests and multiple comparisons with a P-value of 0.05 used to indicate a significant difference. Pearson correlations between parameters were also calculated using R (www.rstudio.com).

Strain TF716, which was isolated from the N2O-reducing consortium, was identified as Pseudomonas sp. (Fig. 1), which is the first N2O-reducing rhizobacterium to be isolated from the rhizosphere soil of tall fescue. Other N2O-reducing Pseudomonas spp. have been isolated from soil18,19, biofilters for treating landfill leachate20, and wastewater treatment plants21. Azospira spp. are N2O reducers that have also been isolated from wastewater treatment processes8,19,22. Other N2O-reducing bacteria that have been reported include Bacillus amyloliquefaciens23 and Ralstonia solanacearum24 isolated from soil, Paracoccus pantotrophus25 and Alicyliphilus sp.22 isolated from wastewater treatment processes, and Aeromicrobium massiliense26 isolated from human fecal manure. Usyskin-Tonne et al.27 also isolated the N2O-reducing bacteria Agrobacterium/Rhizobium sp., Alcaligenes sp., and Pseudomonas sp. from wheat root. Lee et al.12 reported N2O reduction by the bacterial consortium from the rhizosphere of maize and tall fescue.

Phylogenetic relationships between Pseudomonas sp. TF716 and known N2O-reducing bacteria. A neighbor-joining algorithm was used to construct the tree. The scale bar represents 0.1 expected substitutions per site.

Figure 2 presents the N2O reduction activity of isolate TF716 for different N2O loads (200–1500 ppm in the headspace). Isolate TF716 reduced N2O without a lag period under the experimental N2O loads (Fig. 2a), with the N2O reduction rate increasing with higher N2O loads until 750 ppm (15 µM in liquid) before slightly decreasing (Fig. 2b). Other studies have also reported that the N2O reduction rate increases with the concentration of N2O supplied to the final electron acceptor8,28. Figure 2c shows the Lineweaver–Burk plot using the data under conditions proportional to the N2O reduction rate and the N2O concentration (200, 500 and 750 ppm). The maximum N2O reduction rate (Vmax) produced by isolate TF716 was 18.9 mmol N2O g dry cells−1 h−1. In past studies, the N2O reduction rate for Pseudomonas spp. has been reported to be 2.2–2.6 mmol N2O·g dry cells−1 h−18,19,21, while N2O-reducing Azospira spp. exhibited a N2O reduction rate of 1.60 − 23.85 mmol N2O g dry cells−1 h−18,19,22, and that for Alicycliphilus denitrificans was 7.6 mmol N2O g dry cells−1 h−122. Considering these results, the N2O-reduction ability of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 was superior to that of other N2O-reducing bacteria except Azospira sp. strain I13 (23.85 mmol N2O g dry cells−1 h−1)22.

Effect of N2O concentration on N2O reduction by Pseudomonas sp. TF716. (a) Time profile of the N2O concentration with different initial N2O concentrations. (b) N2O reduction rates at different N2O concentrations. (c) Lineweaver–Burk plot used to calculate the maximum specific N2O reduction rate (Vmax).

Tall fescue and maize are widely used for the rhizoremediation of oil-contaminated soil because their roots are well-developed29,30,31,32. The interaction between the roots and rhizobacteria is a key parameter for rhizoremediation performance, with the root exudate potentially positively or negatively affecting rhizobacteria activity33,34,35,36,37. The effect of tall fescue or maize root exudate on N2O reduction by Pseudomonas sp. TF716 is presented in Fig. 3. Compared to the control (without root exudate), N2O levels were more rapidly reduced when the root exudate was applied. By the addition of the root exudate, the N2O reduction rate for strain TF716 increased 1.5-fold of the N2O reduction rate at the control (9.9 ± 0.3 mmol N2O g dry cells−1 h−1). There was no significant difference between the exudates for tall fescue (14.7 ± 0.3 mmol N2O·g dry cells−1 h−1) and maize (14.4 ± 0.8 mmol N2O·g dry cells−1 h−1). Greater N2O reduction with the addition of root exudate has also been reported in previous studies12,38. For example, when root exudate was added to N2O-reducing consortia, the N2O reduction rate was 1.3–2.7 times higher than without the exudate12. The root exudate of plants contains various organic compounds such as sugars, amino acids, organic acids, fatty acids, alcohols, and phosphate12,39,40,41. It is assumed that these organic compounds were utilized as nutrients or growth-promotion factors for strain TF716, thus leading to a higher N2O reduction capacity12,42.

Effect of root exudate (RE) on N2O reduction by Pseudomonas sp. TF716. (a) Time profile of the N2O concentration in the medium with or without the RE. (b) Comparison of the relative N2O reduction rates (w/o RE: without RE; RE_TF: RE of tall fescue; RE_M: RE of maize). Different letters indicate a significant difference in each plot (p < 0.05).

Table 1 presents the inoculation effect of isolate TF716 on the N2O-reduction potential of diesel-contaminated soil planted with tall fescue for rhizoremediation. In the soil without the inoculation, the N2O-reduction potential was 159.4 ± 6.7 nmol g-dry soil−1 h−1 on day 0, reached its maximum on day 19 (315. ± 17.4 nmol g-dry soil-1 h-1), and decreased to 279.9 ± 8.6 and 230.6 ± 0.9 nmol g-dry soil−1 h−1 on days 40 and 59, respectively. This could be because the relative abundance of those bacteria involved in N2O reduction increased after the planting of the tall fescue. However, when isolate TF716 was added, the N2O-reduction potential ranged from 609.1 ± 32.2 to 760.1 ± 58.9 nmol g-dry soil−1 h−1 between days 0 and 19. On days 40 and 59, the potential was 304.8 ± 5.1 and 260.3 ± 5.8 nmol g-dry soil−1 h−1, respectively, half the initial value. This indicates that the population of the inoculated strain remained dominant in the soil for 19 days, but its relative abundance subsequently decreased.

When isolate TF716 was added, the N2O-reduction potential of the soil was 2.88 times higher than with no inoculation during the initial period (0–19 d) and 1.08–1.13 times thereafter. These results suggest that N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil using tall fescue can be reduced by adding Pseudomonas sp. TF716. Usyskin-Tonne et al.27 reported that N2O emissions from wheat rhizosphere soil can be reduced by the addition of Agrobacterium/Rhizobium spp, while P. stutzeri PCN-1 can reduce N2O emissions during wastewater treatment43. In support of this previous research, the present study also demonstrates that the addition of N2O-reducing bacteria is a promising strategy to reduce N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil.

In the soil planted with maize without isolate TF716, the N2O-reduction potential increased over the first 40 days from 159.4 ± 6.7 to 239.5 ± 11.3 nmol g-dry soil−1 h−1, and then it decreased to 177.1 ± 1.7 nmol g-dry soil−1 h−1 by day 59 (Table 1). This change in the N2O-reduction potential with maize was similar to that with tall fescue. When the soil with maize was inoculated with isolate TF716, the soil N2O-reduction potential decreased over time from 760.1 ± 58.9 on day 0 to 156.5 ± 2.4 nmol g-dry soil−1 h−1 on day 59. Thus, with the addition of isolate TF716, the N2O-reduction potential increased 4.8- and 1.3-fold on days 0 and 19, respectively, but was slightly lower than without inoculation after 40 days. This indicates that the inoculated strain did not maintain its dominance in the soil planted with maize. Ferrarezi et al.44 investigated the inoculation effect of rhizobacteria on maize growth. Depending on the combination of the inoculating rhizobacteria, maize growth was either promoted or inhibited. Thus, when introducing a rhizobacterium, the interaction between the bacterium and the plant roots must be clearly understood to ensure that it is a positive combination.

Although isolate TF716 has no ability to degrade diesel itself (data not shown), the effect of its addition to the soil on diesel degradation was evaluated because other soil microorganisms may be affected by its presence (Fig. 4). In the soil planted with tall fescue, the diesel degradation efficiency in the inoculated soil was not significantly different from that in the non-inoculated soil, although the former was slightly faster than the latter. In the soil planted with maize, the diesel degradation in the non-inoculated soil (85 ± 0.8%) was slightly higher than in the inoculated soil (80 ± 0.4%) on day 19, but there was no difference on day 59. Overall, TF716 inoculation did not affect diesel degradation during rhizoremediation, suggesting that the isolate does not inhibit the activity of the microorganisms that are involved in diesel degradation.

Comparison of the diesel-removal efficiency on days (a) 19 and (b) 59 during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soils (TF: soil planted with tall fescue; TF + 716: soil planted with tall fescue with the addition of strain TF716; M: soil planted with maize; M + 716: soil planted with maize with the addition of strain TF716). Different letters indicate a significant difference in each plot (p < 0.05).

In general, plant growth in contaminated soil is inhibited by pollutants, but it can be improved with the introduction of rhizobacteria. For example, the root growth of castor beans was promoted with the addition of a bacterial consortium into Pb and Zn-contaminated soil34. The addition of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJ also reduced the inhibition of the root and stem growth of ryegrass in diesel-contaminated soil45, while the inhibition of mangrove in diesel-contaminated soil was reduced by introducing Bacillus, Sphingomonas, and Rhodococcus46. In addition, Gordonia sp. S2RP-17 enhanced the growth of maize in diesel-contaminated soil47, and the shoot and root growth of tall fescue in PCB-contaminated soil increased when the soil was inoculated with Bulkholeria spp.48.

To investigate the effect of isolate TF716 on plant growth, its indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-production ability and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity was first assessed, and it was found that it produced IAA but not ACC deaminase (data not shown). The inoculation effect of the isolate TF716 on the root growth of tall fescue and maize was then evaluated (Fig. 5). Compared with the control groups without inoculation, the addition of strain TF716 slightly enhanced the root growth of tall fescue, although this was not significant. In the soil planted with maize, strain TF716 had little effect on the N2O-reduction potential and diesel degradation (Table 1 and Fig. 4), but it unexpectedly enhanced the root growth of maize. Further research is required to elucidate the reason for this.

Inoculation effect of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 on the root growth of (a) tall fescue and (b) maize (TF: soil planted with tall fescue; TF + 716: soil planted with tall fescue with the addition of strain TF716; M: soil planted with maize; M + 716: soil planted with maize with the addition of strain TF716). In the box plots, the boxes represent the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, and the error bars indicate the 5th and 95th percentiles. Points outside the boxes indicate outliers. The dashed line indicates the median. Different letters indicate a significant difference in each plot (p < 0.05).

Figure 6 shows the dynamics of 12 genera involved in N2O reduction during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Bacterial species belonging to Bradyrhizobium, Aminobacter, Mesorhizobium, Shinella, Paracoccus, Azospirillum, Alcaligenes, Castellaniella, and Pseudomonas have been reported to reduce N2O 49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61. Some also contain nosZ genes, which are responsible for the reduction of N2O to N252,54,57,59,62,63,64,65. Bordetella and Acidovorax have been reported to be denitrifying bacteria with nirS and nar/nir genes, respectively66,67,68.

Dynamics of the bacterial genera associated with N2O reduction during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. (a) Soil planted with tall fescue. (b) Soil planted with tall fescue with the addition of strain TF716. (c) Soil planted with maize. (d) Soil planted with maize with the addition of strain TF716.

Based on the analysis of the bacterial community dynamics, the dominant genera in the diesel-contaminated soils were Pseudomonas, Bradyrhizobium, and Mesorhizobium. Pseudomonas exhibited the highest relative abundance in all soil samples except for that for the soil planted with maize taken on day 59. In the soil planted with tall fescue, the relative abundance of Pseudomonas was 18.5–22.6% for the initial period (0–19 d), decreasing to 9.0% and 5.0% on days 40 and 59, respectively. In the TF716-inoculated soil planted with tall fescue, the relative abundance of Pseudomonas increased from 75.5 to 95.5% during the first 19 days, but decreased thereafter to 31.2% on day 59. However, in the soil planted with maize, the relative abundance of Pseudomonas tended to decrease with time with or without the presence of TF716. Since the Pseudomonas TF716 was isolated from the tall fescue’s rhizosphere, it is thought to be able to grow better in the tall fescue’s rhizosphere compared to maize’s corn rhizosphere. It is estimated that the relative abundance of the genus Pseudomonas to which TF716 belongs has decreased over time because the strain TF716 inoculated into the soil competes with indigenous soil N2O-reducers. In all soil samples, the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium and Mesorhizobium increased with time, reaching 1.5–2.3% and 1.3–5.3% on day 59, respectively. In contrast, the relative abundance of Parcoccus, Alcaligenes, and Catenllaniella decreased over time.

Figure 7 shows the correlation between TF716 inoculation, the N2O-reduction potential of the soil, the TPH-removal efficiency, plant type, and bacterial genera. The N2O-reduction potential was positively correlated with the addition of TF716 and the relative abundance of Pseudomonas (which includes strain TF716). The N2O-reduction potential was positively correlated with the addition of isolate TF716 and the relative abundance of Pseudomonas. Pseudomonas has previously been utilized as a biosource for the rhizoremediation of TPH-contaminated soil69,70,71,72. In particular, the introduction of Pseudomonas, which has plant growth-promoting traits such as ACC deaminase, IAA, and siderophore production, enhances plant growth, consequently improving remediation performance69,70. The positive inoculation effect of Pseudomonas in mitigating N2O emissions in agricultural soils has also been reported61,73. The present study also demonstrates that N2O emissions can be reduced during the rhizoremediation of TPH-contaminated soil using Pseudomonas TF716.

Pearson correlation between key parameters (N2O: N2O-reduction potential of the soil; TPHs RE: TPH-removal efficiency; Maize: maize planting; Tall fescue: tall fescue planting; TF716: Pseudomonas sp. TF716 inoculation; Genus-level bacteria: abundance of bacterial genera).

The TPH-removal efficiency had a close relationship with the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium and Mesorhizobium, which were significantly correlated with maize. They also had a positive correlation with each other. Their capacity for N2O reduction has been demonstrated in past research49,50,51,53,54. Bradyrhizobium can degrade various hydrocarbons such as chloroalkanes, chloroalkenes, and benzonate74, and Mesorhizobium is a known TPH-degrader75. Bradyrhizobium and Mesorhizobium were also the dominant bacterial groups in n-decane-degrading consortia76. As shown in Fig. 6, the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium and Mesorhizobium increased during the rhizoremediation process. Based on these results, it is clear that they play a major role in TPH degradation and N2O reduction in diesel-contaminated soils planted with maize and tall fescue. Although Azospirillum is known to promote maize growth77, it had a positive correlation with tall fescue but not maize in the present study.

There were also some significant correlations among 12 bacterial genera in the soil samples. Pseudomonas sp. TF716 had a negative correlation with most of the bacterial genera. Aminobacter had a positive relationship with Shinella, Azosporillum, and Bordetella, while Shinella was positively related to Paracoccus, Azosporillum, Bordetella, and Castelaniella. Paracoccus exhibited a high positive correlation with Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Bordetella, and Castelaniella. Achromobacter was associated with Bordetella and Castelaniella, while Alcaligens had a close relationship with Bordetella and Castelaniella, and the relative abundance of Bordetella was positively related to Castelaniella. Aminobacter has been reported to degrade 2,6-dichlorobenzamide78,79. In addition, Shinella, Paracoccus, Azospirillum, Achromobacter, Alcaligenes, Bordetalla, Castenella, and Acidovorax are known to decompose TPHs75,80,81,82,83,84. Although no statistical correlation was found, these bacterial groups are assumed to be involved in TPH degradation and nitrogenous compound metabolism, including N2O production and mitigation.

N2O is one of the six greenhouse gases listed in the Kyoto Protocol, and it has a GWP that is 298 times higher than that of CO2 (IPCC, 2013). During the rhizoremediation of TPH-contaminated soil, nitrogen sources are typically added to promote remediation performance, thus increasing N2O emissions. To mitigate N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation of TPH-contaminated soil, strategies that effectively reduce these emissions without negatively affecting the TPH-degrading process are required. Pseudomonas sp. TF716, isolated from the rhizosphere of tall fescue, exhibited a N2O reduction rate of 18.9 mmol N2O·g dry cells−1 h−1, and its N2O reduction activity was enhanced by the addition of the root exudate of tall fescue. By introducing Pseudomonas sp. TF716 to diesel-contaminated soil planted with tall fescue, the N2O-reduction potential of the soil increased without compromising the degradation process. During rhizoremediation for 59 days, Pseudomonas maintained the highest relative abundance in the soil. However, no enhancement in the N2O-reduction potential of the soil planted with maize was observed when Pseudomonas sp. TF716 was added, even though the N2O-reduction activity of this bacterium in a liquid medium was improved with the addition of the root exudate from maize. These results indicate that the addition of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 is a promising strategy to mitigate N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil using tall fescue. This study is the first report that it is possible to reduce N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation of oil-contaminated soil by the inoculation of a N2O-reducing bacterium. Follow-up studies are required to optimize the physicochemical conditions for the activity of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 in the contaminated soil. Additionally, further study on the interaction between N2O-reducing rhizobacteria and plant roots is needed for the successful mitigation of N2O emissions during the rhizoremediation process.

The sequence for isolate TF716 was deposited in the NCBI GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under accession number MW882239. The obtained sequencing reads for the analysis of the bacterial community were deposited in the NCBI under accession number PRJNA791149.

Hussain, I. et al. Rhizoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: Improvement opportunities and field applications. Environ. Exp. Bot. 147, 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.12.016 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ron, E. Z. & Rosenberg, E. Enhanced bioremediation of oil spills in the sea. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 27, 91–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.02.004 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Aisien, F. A., Chiadikobi, J. C. & Aisien, E. T. Toxicity assessment of some crude oil contaminated soils in the Niger delta. Adv. Mat. Res. 62, 451–455. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.62-64.451 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Fatima, K. et al. Plant-bacteria synergism: an innovative approach for the remediation of crude oil-contaminated soils. Soil Environ. 36, 93–113 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Salanitro, J. P. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. Adv. Agron. 72, 53–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)72011-1 (2001).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Singh, B. P. et al. Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. J. Environ. Qual. 39, 1224–1235. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0138 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hénault, C. et al. Nitrous oxide emission by agricultural soils: a review of spatial and temporal variability for mitigation. Pedosphere 22, 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60029-0 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Park, H. J. et al. Characterization of nitrous oxide reduction by Azospira sp. HJ23 isolated from advanced wastewater treatment sludge. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Toxic Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng. 55, 1459–1467 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

IPCC. Climate change 2013, The physical science basis, Working group 1 contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

Johnston, H. Reduction of stratospheric ozone by nitrogen oxide catalysts from supersonic transport exhaust. Science 173, 517–522. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3996.517 (1971).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wayne, R. P. Chemistry of atmosphere (Oxford University Press, 2000).

Google Scholar

Lee, S. et al. Characterization of CH4-oxidizing and N2O-reducing bacterial consortia enriched using rhizosphere of maize and tall fescue. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 49, 225–238 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lee, Y. Y. et al. Dynamics of bacterial functional genes and community structures during rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated compost-amended soil. Sci. Health Part A-Toxic/Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng. 56, 1107–1120 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Henry, S. et al. Quantitative detection of the nosZ gene, encoding nitrous oxide reductase, and comparison of the abundances of 16S rRNA, narG, nirK, and nosZ genes in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5181–5189. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00231-06 (2006).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, W. et al. Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis. Brief Bioinform. 13, 656–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs035 (2012).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yokoyama, K. et al. Characterization of denitrification and net N2O-reduction properties of novel aerobically N2O-reducing bacteria. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 62, 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1178076 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Suenaga, T. et al. Biokinetic characterization and activities of N2O-reducing bacteria in response to various oxygen levels. Front. Microbiol. 9, 697. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00697 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zheng, M. et al. Reducing NO and N2O emission during aerobic denitrification by newly isolated Pseudomonas stutzeri PCN-1. Bioresour. Technol. 162, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.125 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Miyahara, M. et al. Potential of aerobic denitrification by Pseudomonas stutzeri TR2 to reduce nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 4619–4625. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01983-09 (2010).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhou, Y. et al. Nitrous oxide-sink capability of denitrifying bacteria impacted by nitrite and pH. Chem. Eng. J. 428, 132402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132402 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wu, S. et al. Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions from acidic soils by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, a plant growth-promoting bacterium. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2352–2365. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14025 (2018).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Dalsing, B. L. et al. Ralstonia solanacearum uses inorganic nitrogen metabolism for virulence, ATP production, and detoxification in the oxygen-limited host xylem environment. mBio 6, e02471. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02471-14 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Read-Daily, B. L. et al. Kinetics of nitrous oxide (N2O) formation and reduction by Paracoccus pantotrophus. AMB Express 6, 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-016-0258-0 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ramasamy, D. et al. Genome sequence and description of Aeromicrobium massiliense sp. nov. Stand. Genomic Sci. 7, 246–257. https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3306717 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Usyskin-Tonne, A. et al. Altering N2O emissions by manipulating wheat root bacterial community. Sci. Rep. 9, 7613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44124-3 (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Okereke, G. U. Growth yield of denitrifiers using nitrous oxide as a terminal electron acceptor. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 9, 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656518 (1993).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lee, Y. Y. et al. Evaluation of rhizoremediation and methane emission in diesel-contaminated soil cultivated with tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Environ. Res. 194, 110606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110606 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gerhardt, K. E. et al. Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: Potential and challenges. Plant Sci. 176, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.09.014 (2009).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tang, J. C. et al. Characterisation of the rhizoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil: effect of different influencing factors. Biogeosciences 7, 3961–3969. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-3961-2010 (2010).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Guo, M. et al. Enhanced polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons degradation in rhizosphere soil planted with tall fescue: Bacterial community and functional gene expression mechanisms. Chemosphere 212, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.057 (2018).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lima, J. V. et al. Rhizobacteria modify root architecture and improve nutrient uptake in oil palm seedlings despite reduced fertilizer. Rhizosphere 19, 100420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100420 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Li, X. et al. Cultivable rhizobacteria improve castor bean seedlings root and plant growth in Pb–Zn treated soil. Rhizosphere 19, 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100406 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Liu, Y. et al. Root exudates shift how N mineralization and N fixation contribute to the plant-available N supply in low fertility soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 165, 108541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108541 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liao, Q. et al. Root exudates enhance the PAH degradation and degrading gene abundance in soils. Sci. Total Environ. 764, 144436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144436 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fernandez, M. et al. Investigating the role of root exudates in the interaction between oak seedlings and purple moor grass in temperate forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 491, 119175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119175 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Henry, S. et al. Disentangling the rhizosphere effect on nitrate reducers and denitrifiers: Insight into the role of root exudates. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 3082–3092. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01599.x (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Naveed, M. et al. Plant exudates may stabilize or weaken soil depending on species, origin and time. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 68, 806–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12487 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Valé, M. et al. Microbial activity in the rhizosphere soil of six herbaceous species cultivated in a greenhouse is correlated with shoot biomass and root C concentrations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 2329–2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.014 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liu, W. et al. Collection and analysis of root exudates of Festuca arundinacea L. and their role in facilitating the phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soil. Plant Soil 389, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2345-9 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Yan, F., Schubert, S. & Mengel, K. Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic anions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 617–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)00180-8 (1996).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tian, Z. et al. Mitigating NO and N2O emissions from a pilot-scale oxidation ditch using bioaugmentation of immobilized aerobic denitrifying bacteria. Bioresour. Technol. 340, 125704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125704 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ferrarezi, J. A. et al. Effects of inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from the Brazilian Amazon on the bacterial community associated with maize in field. Appl. Soil Ecol. 170, 104297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104297 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Afzal, M. et al. Inoculation method affects colonization and activity of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN during phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 85, 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.08.022 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Khan, A. L. et al. Mangrove’s rhizospheric engineering with bacterial inoculation improve degradation of diesel contamination. J. Hazard. Mater. 423, 127046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127046 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hong, S. H. et al. Rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil using the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Gordonia sp. S2RP-17. Biodegradation 22, 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-010-9432-2 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Secher, C. et al. Decontamination of a polychlorinated biphenyls-contaminated soil by phytoremediation-assisted bioaugmentation. Biodegradation 24, 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-013-9625-6 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Woliy, K., Degefu, T. & Frostegård, Å. Host range and symbiotic effectiveness of N2O reducing Bradyrhizobium strains. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02746 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Akiyama, H. et al. Mitigation of soil N2O emission by inoculation with a mixed culture of indigenous Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens. Sci. Rep. 6, 32869. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32869 (2016).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Siqueira, A. F., Minamisawa, K. & Sánchez, C. Anaerobic reduction of nitrate to nitrous oxide is lower in Bradyrhizobium japonicum than in Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens. Microbes Environ. 32, 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME17081 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kumar, A. et al. Molecular and ecological perspectives of nitrous oxide producing microbial communities in agro-ecosystems. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 19, 717–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09554-w (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Siddiqi, M. Z. et al. Mesorhizobium denitrificans sp. Nov., a novel denitrifying bacterium isolated from sludge. J. Microbiol. 57, 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-019-8590-0 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fang, S. et al. Effects of sulfoxaflor on greenhouse vegetable soil N2O emissions and its microbial driving mechanism. Chemosphere 267, 129248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129248 (2021).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Boonnorat, J. et al. Enhanced micropollutant biodegradation and assessment of nitrous oxide concentration reduction in wastewater treated by acclimatized sludge bioaugmentation. Sci. Total Environ. 637, 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.066 (2018).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Thakur, I. S. & Medhi, K. Nitrification and denitrification processes for mitigation of nitrous oxide from waste water treatment plants for biovalorization: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 282, 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.069 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Shi, Y., Liu, X. & Zhang, Q. Effects of combined biochar and organic fertilizer on nitrous oxide fluxes and the related nitrifier and denitrifier communities in a saline-alkali soil. Sci. Total Environ. 686, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.394 (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wang, Y. et al. Gene cloning, expression, and reducing property enhancement of nitrous oxide reductase from Alcaligenes denitrificans strain TB. Environ. Pollut. 239, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.005 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yang, Y. et al. Microbial driving mechanism of biochar and bean dregs on NH3 and N2O emissions during composting. Bioresour. Technol. 315, 123829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123829 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hu, L. et al. NosZ gene cloning, reduction performance and structure of Pseudomonas citronellolis WXP-4 nitrous oxide reductase. RSC Adv. 12, 2549–2557. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA09008A (2022).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Thomson, A. J. et al. Biological sources and sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate emissions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 367, 1157–1168. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0415 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hurtado-Martinez, M. et al. Groundwater nitrate removal performance of selected Pseudomonas Strains carrying nosZ gene in aerobic granular sequential batch reactors. Water 13, 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081119 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Velasco, L. et al. Molecular characterization of nosRZDFYLX genes coding for denitrifying nitrous oxide reductase of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 85, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANTO.0000020156.42470.db (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bai, Y. et al. Aerobic degradation of pyridine by a new bacterial strain, Shinella zoogloeoides BC026. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36, 1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-009-0625-9 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Olaya-Abril, A. et al. Exploring the denitrification proteome of Paracoccus denitrificans PD1222. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1137 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Hou, S. et al. Structure and assembly cues for rhizospheric nirK-and nirS-type denitrifier communities in long-term fertilized soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 119, 32–40 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lv, B. et al. Effects of earthworms on nitrogen transformation and the correspond genes (amoA and nirS) in vermicomposting of sewage sludge and rice straw. Bioresour. Technol. 287, 121428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121428 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fang, D. et al. Polymer substrate reshapes the microbial assemblage and metabolic patterns within a biofilm denitrification system. Chem. Eng. J. 387, 124128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124128 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tara, N. et al. Combined use of alkane-degrading and plant growth-promoting bacteria enhanced phytoremediation of diesel contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytoremediation 16, 1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2013.828013 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wu, T. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa L10: a hydrocarbon-degrading, biosurfactant-producing, and plant-growth-promoting endophytic bacterium isolated from a reed (Phragmites australis). Front. Microbiol. 9, 1087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01087 (2018).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhang, X. et al. Synergic degradation of diesel by Scirpus triqueter and its endophytic bacteria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 8198–8205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2807-x (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ebadi, A. et al. Remediation of saline soils contaminated with crude oil using the halophyte Salicornia persica in conjunction with hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria. J. Environ. Manage. 219, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.115 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wan, S., Ward, T. L. & Altosaar, I. Strategy and tactics of disarming GHG at the source: N2O reductase crops. Trends Biotechnol. 30, 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.04.002 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Manucharova, N. A. et al. Microbial degraders of petroleum and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from sod-podzolic soil. Microbiology 90, 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261721060096 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Nebeská, D. et al. Miscanthus x giganteus role in phytodegradation and changes in bacterial community of soil contaminated by petroleum industry. Ecotox. Environ. Safe 224, 112630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112630 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhang, X. et al. Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons by alkali–salt-tolerant microbial consortia and their community profiles. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 96, 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6594 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Florio, A. Z. et al. The responses of NO2− and N2O-reducing bacteria to maize inoculation by the PGPR Azospirillum lipoferum CRT1 depend on carbon availability and determine soil gross and net N2O production. Soil Biol. Biochem. 136, 107524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107524 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Beynon, K. I. & Wright, A. N. Persistence, penetration, and breakdown of chlorthiamid and dichlobenil herbicides in field soils of different types. J. Sci. Food Agric. 19, 718–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740191208 (1968).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hylling, O. et al. A novel hybrid concept for implementation in drinking water treatment targets micropollutant removal by combining membrane filtration with biodegradation. Sci. Total Environ. 694, 133710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133710 (2019).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hong, Y. H. et al. Characterization of the transcriptome of Achromobacter sp. HZ01 with the outstanding hydrocarbon-degrading ability. Gene 584, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2016.02.032 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yalaoui-Guellal, D. et al. The petroleum-degrading bacteria Alcaligenes aquatilis strain YGD 2906 as a potential source of lipopeptide biosurfactant. Fuel 285, 119112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119112 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mikolasch, A. et al. Diversity and degradative capabilities of bacteria and fungi isolated from oil-contaminated and hydrocarbon-polluted soils in Kazakhstan. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 103, 7261–7274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10032-9 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Okonkwo, C. J., Liu, N. & Li, J. Impacts of experimental decreasing groundwater levels on bacterial community composition and hydrocarbon attenuation in oil-polluted soil from Northern China. Int. J. Energ. Water Res. 5, 5447–5460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-021-00143-3 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Yu, X. et al. Indigenous microorganisms residing in oil sands tailings biodegrade residual bitumen. Chemosphere 209, 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.126 (2018).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government through the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (2019R1A2C2006701).

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea

Ji-Yoon Kim & Kyung-Suk Cho

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

J.Y. K. wrote the manuscript, and K.S.C. reviewed the the manuscript.

Correspondence to Kyung-Suk Cho.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Kim, JY., Cho, KS. Inoculation effect of Pseudomonas sp. TF716 on N2O emissions during rhizoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Sci Rep 12, 13018 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17356-z

Download citation

Received: 04 April 2022

Accepted: 25 July 2022

Published: 29 July 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17356-z

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.